Question: What’s the difference between fine wine,
and a fine whiner?
Answer: one enhances anything it is served with, the other, well, what’s the opposite of “enhances”?
In a sneak-peek for a special “First Ladies” interview with C-SPAN, former First Lady Laura Bush responds to a question about whether or not the president’s spouse should get a salary. She replies that she doesn’t “think so,” because “there are plenty of perks.”
About life in the White House: “Don’t ask! It’s hell. I can’t stand it!”
About a 9-11 ceremony: “All this for a damn flag?”
So, as the world burns and our stomachs churn, BO holds a “Working Family Summit,” and has lunch at Chipotle with a hand selected diverse group of people concerned about such things. Meanwhile, Lady M lectures us on why we need a female president “as soon as possible” because “this country is ready for anyone who can do the job."
Well yes; I suppose after five and a half years, having “anyone who can do the job” would be refreshing, wouldn’t it?
Anyway, I wonder if Lady M has any woman particular in mind for president, or if any “female” would fill the bill.
I’m guessing the answers are “yes” and “no.” What do you think?
Cross-Posted on Patriot Action Network