The Associated Students of University of California (ASUCI) passed a resolution March 3 that would remove the Stars & Stripes along with every other flag from the lobby of a complex housing the offices of the student government.
Last week the children of UC Irvine determined that:
The American flag has been flown in instances of colonialism and imperialism. Flags not only serve as symbols of patriotism or weapons for nationalism, but also construct cultural mythologies and narratives that in turn charge nationalistic sentiments.”
Therefore, let’s agree to ban these weapons for “nationalism”
The American Cemetery, Normandy, France
Stop the “cultural mythologies”
And “narratives”
that “charge nationalistic sentiments”.
Yeah, let’s get rid of all that and make way for more of this…
“There is another class of coloured people who make a business of keeping the troubles, the wrongs and the hardships of the Negro race before the public. Having learned that they are able to make a living out of their troubles, they have grown into the settled habit of advertising their wrongs – partly because they want sympathy and partly because it pays. Some of these people do not want the Negro to lose his grievances, because they do not want to lose their jobs.” - Booker T. Washington (1865–1915)
This is a question which emerges from every race-mongering incident that RINO (reverend-in-name-only) Al Sharpton has ever participated in.
Unfortunately it’s just collateral damage that occurs as Al pursues his higher life purpose: proving that Black lies not only matter, butt they open many doors and pay well. As he’s been dedicated to this calling for nearly 30 years; let’s review some of the highlights of his career, beginning with the 1987 Tawana Brawley hoax:
(Worth every minute to watch)
15 year old Tawana Brawley made-up stories of rape and racist mistreatment at the hands of white cops – apparently to avoid punishment for a tryst with her boyfriend. The Rev stepped in to ratchet up the racial animosity and ugliness. Eventually the grand jury found "overwhelming evidence" that Brawley had fabricated her story and dismissed the case butt not before Sharpton and 2 attorneys had ruined Duchess County prosecutor Steven Pagones’ life by accusing him of racism and of being one of the perpetrators of the alleged abduction and rape. Despite winning a defamation case against the three, Mr. Pagones life was forever altered by the charges. Because Black Lies Matter.
And then there was RINO Al Sharpton’s First Anti-Semitic Race-Riot in Crown Heights in the summer of 1991:
Twenty-three years ago a tragic car accident in Crown Heights Brooklyn escalated into a pogrom against the Jewish people. The media gives it a politically correct description, violence between the area's Blacks and Jews. However the violence was not two-sided. The Crown Heights riot was an attack on the Jews by the neighborhood's Caribbean community, fueled in large part by Al Sharpton, the "Reverend" who does not believe in the commandment about "bearing false witness."
The full story of Sharpton's first Anti-Semitic race riot here, may also explain the basis of the current Jewish/black community animosity, hint: “Black Muslims.”
In spite of the strong Jewish participation in the civil rights movement the transformation from the peaceful marches to Black power movement introduced considerable friction into African American-Jewish relations, especially within the “Black Muslim” movement. During the 1970s and 1980s African-Americans stopped looking at Jews as their allies but as their oppressors. The Jews were seen as having the political power that the African-Americans desired. Black leaders such as Louis Farrakhan, and Jesse Jackson went public with anti-Semitic comments.
So a tragic car accident left a little black boy dead and once again Rino Al was there to stir it up into a full blown race riot:
“Then we had a famous man, Al Sharpton, who came down, and he said Tuesday night, kill the Jews, two times. I heard him, and he started to lead a charge across the street to Utica.”
Once again, white lives matter, just not as much as Black Lies Matter. In a eulogy for the dead boy, Sharpton (among other anti-Semitic remarks) perpetrated a complete lie circulating about the ambulance refusing to take little Gavin Cato to the hospital right away :
“The world will tell us he was killed by accident. Yes, it was a social accident...It's an accident to allow an apartheid ambulance service in the middle of Crown Heights. ... Talk about how Oppenheimer in South Africa sends diamonds straight to Tel Aviv and deals with the diamond merchants right here in Crown Heights. The issue is not anti-Semitism; the issue is apartheid. ... All we want to say is what Jesus said: If you offend one of these little ones, you got to pay for it. No compromise, no meetings, no kaffe klatsch, no skinnin' and grinnin'. Pay for your deeds."
Before this ugly episode was put to rest, 29-year-old Australian Jewish scholar Yankel Rosenbaum was stabbed to death by a group of black men and Italian-American, Anthony Graziosi, was dragged out of his car, brutally beaten and stabbed to death because his full beard and dark clothing caused him to be mistaken for a Hasidic Jew. Where do they go to get their lives back?
The United House of Prayer, a large African-American church was also a major landlord in Harlem. They raised the rent Freddy's Fashion Mart, a Jewish-owned clothing store which had operated from the same Harlem location for over 40 years. In turn Freddy's had to raise the rent on its sub-tenant, a black-owned record store. A landlord-tenant dispute ensued. As he has done so often in his life, Al Sharpton turned this non-racial economic dispute into a racial conflict.
The Sharpton-led protests began in August and came to a head on the morning of Friday, December 8th when Roland James Smith, Jr., who had been part of the Sharpton's protests, walked into Freddy's Fashion Mart, pulled out a gun, ordered all the black customers to leave, spilled paint thinner on several bins of clothing and set them on fire -- a fire that resulted in killing 7 people plus Smith.
The Rev claimed that his professional agitating - in person and on his radio show - had nothing to do with the arson.
Sharpton, the professional bigot criticized NYPD investigators for quickly linking the fire to the protesters. But the police evidence and the tapes from the Jewish Alliance proved him to be a liar.
Of course white-Hispanic lives matter, just not as much as Black Lies Matter. Where can Angelina Marrero, Cynthia Martinez, Luz Ramos, Mayra Rentas, Olga Garcia, Garnette Ramautar and Kareem Brunner go to get their lives back?
Not that there weren’tinterim incidents, agitators have to agitate, after all, butt let’s fast forward to the Age of Obama: Trayvon Martin is killed by a “white-hispanic” and there’s our RINO Al, declaring that the not guilty verdict was an "atrocity" and "a slap in the face to those that believe in justice." Where does George Zimmerman go to get his white-Hispanic reputation back? Nowhere, because Black Lies Matter.
Michael Brown is killed by a white police officer after resisting arrest…and there’s the Rev, perpetrating more lies and empathizing with more grieving parents. To quote the Yid with a Lid:
Sharpton couldn't give a rat's ass about (fill in the current name), his grieving family or improving the lives of African Americans in this country. He is only concerned with selling his product.
So how is it, that a man such as Sharpton - who thinks routine obligations like taxes, rent and other bills are for less important people to pay - has come to be Big Guy’s “go-to man on race;” exchanging texts and phone calls with top administration officials and gaining access to the White House almost at will?
Politico reported that Sharpton was Obama’s “go-to man on race,” exchanging texts and phone calls with top administration officials. “There’s a trust factor with The Rev from the Oval Office on down,” a White House official familiar with their dealings told Politico. “He gets it, and he’s got credibility in the community that nobody else has got.”
How is it that the Rev is apparently more highly regarded by our President than is Benjamin Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of Israel? I suspect it has something to do with which one is more useful in advancing Big Guy’s agenda: the self-promoting racist/anti-Semite domestic rabble rouser?
Or the Jewish head of state standing in the way of Peace in Our Times? If you still need help with the answer, remember Jewish lives matter, butt, always, Black Lies Matter More.
The Meitiv kids, engaging in unapproved “dangerous behavior”
How can you hold someone responsible for anything that’s “unsubstantiated?” Where, other than government bureaucracies, would that NOT be an oxymoron?
Perhaps I need to elaborate; what exactly is “unsubstantiated neglect?” It is something that is not illegal (the law being silent on it) butt that some busybody – in this case Maryland Child Protective Services – thinks should be. Therefore they create an “illegal” act on their own (“unsubstantiated neglect”) in order to file charges against people doing things they strongly disapprove of but their liberal legislature has failed to make illegal yet. I wonder where they even got the idea they could do that?
I’m warning you! I’ve got a pen!
And I’m not afraid to use it.
This is going to get a little sticky if “unsubstantiated neglect” is going to be the standard for illegality however. Somebody might get it in their head that Big Guy could be held responsible on several counts of “unsubstantiated neglect.” Even though in many people’s heads the malfeasance and misfeasance has been more than “substantiated.” Nevertheless, this new standard raises many possibilities for prosecution:
“Unsubstantiated neglect” of the Constitution for unilaterally amending Obamacare (8 charges) without Congressional action.
“Unsubstantiated neglect” of the Constitution for unilaterally amending immigration law (6 charges) without Congressional action.
“Unsubstantiated neglect” by making “recess appointments” when the Senate was not in recess.
“Aggravated unsubstantiated neglect” and dereliction of duty with respect to the non-response to the Benghazi terrorist attack of 9-11-2012.
“Aggravated unsubstantiated neglect” and dereliction of duty with respect to the enabling of Iran to gain nuclear weapons (while vowing to prevent it).
Yikes! This “expansion of powers” thing can get out of hand pretty fast can’t it? So what’s the moral of this story?
“While a presidential pen in hand is worth two laws in the bush;
watch your back because any one of them can turn on you in a thrice.”
So remember kids, never walk alone: be sure to take Big Government with you wherever you go. Because it will always have your back.
How ironic.The only evidence to survive the great Obama pre-presidential document purge of 2006-2008 was an article in the March,1983 Columbia student newspaper on the benefits of a nuclear free world. How it slipped past the purginators is a mystery, but given the New York Times did an article on it in 2009 titledObama’s Youth Shaped His Nuclear-Free Vision, I can only conclude it was not a slipup.
He was clearly trying to sort out his thoughts. In the conclusion, he denounced “the twisted logic of which we are a part today” and praised student efforts to realize “the possibility of a decent world.” But his article, “Breaking the War Mentality,” which only recently has been rediscovered, said little about how to achieve the utopian dream.
Twenty-six years later, the author, in his new job as president of the United States, has begun pushing for new global rules, treaties and alliances that he insists can establish a nuclear-free world.
Indeed, young Barry’s article sounds like a front row report, live, from the Freshman seminar on nuclear disarmament:
“Generally, the narrow focus of the Freeze movement as well as academic discussion of the first versus second strike capabilities, suit the military-industrial interests, as they continue adding to their billion dollar erector sets.”
As you can see, Barry’s principled dislike of the military began early on (sorry General Petraeus, you’re just collateral damage). Fortunately for the world, most of us never got the opportunity to force our sophomoric worldview onto the rest of the planet; unfortunately, Barry has. And despite having evolved on things like the debt limit and gay marriage he’s remained steadfast in his views on nuclear disarmament. As he told the world during hisfirst world apology tour:
“As the only nuclear power to have used a nuclear weapon, the United States has a moral responsibility to act.… So today, I state clearly and with conviction America’s commitment to seek the peace and security of a world without nuclear weapons. I’m not naïve. This goal will not be reached quickly—perhaps not in my lifetime. It will take patience and persistence. But now, we, too, must ignore the voices who tell us that the world cannot change. We have to insist, ‘Yes, we can…’”
Among the many fallacious assumptions contained in that statement is this most conspicuous one: “I’m not naïve.” If we are to assume that, then we must also believe that he is purposely handing the keys to the nuclear bomb cabinet to Iran - the most malignantly hostile regime on the planet. And that means one of two things: either the most intelligent man ever elected to the Presidency of the United States is, indeed, naïve; or, he is somebody’s puppet. Let’s stick with the lesser of two evils and assume he’s still stuck in the academic milieu, where good intentions are as good as the real thing.
Noble Peace Prize for Good Intentions
As Big Guy himself noted 32 years ago:
“Indeed the most pervasive malady of the collegial system specifically and the American experience generally, is that elaborate patterns of knowledge and theory have been disembodied from individual choices and government policy.”
I’m withDewey From Detroit on this one: I’m not exactly sure what that means butt I agree that knowledge has been disembodied from government policy. Assuming that rogue nations from the Evil Empire will abandon their nuclear ambitions when the United States and Russia (which is a long shot at this point anyway) abandon theirs seems the very definition of naïve.
I just report, you can deride. Butt the endgame at this point remains on track: the black hearted mullahs of Iran who have officially declared “death to Israel” and “death to America” remain on track to acquire nuclear weapons. If you think otherwise I assume you missed Bibi’s speech yesterday.
“America’s founding document promises life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Iran’s founding document pledges death, tyranny and the pursuit of jihad, and as states are collapsing across the Middle East, Iran is charging into the void to do just that.”
So despite Big Guy’s college pipe dreams and fondest hopes, neither history nor human nature are on his side. Frank J. Gaffney Jr., a former Pentagon official from the Reagan era, pointed out that:
“There is only one country on earth that Team Obama can absolutely, positively denuclearize: Ours.”
In light of all the troubles in the world, that seems a rather foolish path to go down. Likewise, so does striking a “deal” with Iran that lifts sanctions and sure-as-the-sun-rises-in-the-east leaves them on their path to nuclear warheads. That seems the least likely path to world peace that I can imagine.
I liked the thought of a nuclear free world when I was in college too. Like drugs, sex and rock and roll, it seemed a good idea at the time. We could all afford to be naive and even stupid when we were college seniors. We can’t afford for the leader of the free world to be stuck on stupid.
There comes a time in the stream of history when we must ask the college professors and community organizers to stand aside and make way for the military leaders. Otherwise, we’re never going to make it to the other side of the Delaware.
Why couldn’t he have just kept his yap zipped? Why couldn’t he have just kept his little act of sabotage a secret and let some future art historian discover it while researching his papers? No, like everyone else around here, he needed instant gratification.
America could have lived with a portrait of Big Dawg that looks like Ted Koppel, butt it will not abide with one that is subversive. So not only will the Bubba painting be removed from the National Gallery, butt artist Nelson Shanks will certainly not get an opportunity to paint any of the shadows of this presidency.
If you haven’t already read my post Tomorrow’s Post Today…Because It’s Time to Panic please do so, as it contains important information that you need to disseminate to everyone you know or can otherwise reach. Doug Ross is all over it, and you should be too. Everyone needs to hammer their duly elected representatives with cries of genuine outrage and threats of withholding funds and votes if they fail to do the bidding of we the people. And if that doesn’t work…well, we will cross that bridge when we come to it.
So here’s the plan, once all the Zombies are on the bridge, blow it up!
We need new infrastructure any way.
Now then, as we prepare for Netanyahu’s speech tomorrow [ed. if you haven’t readClarice’s excellent American Thinker articlefrom yesterday it provides an excellent albeit chilling historical parallel] I would like to bring to your attention an event that didn’t get its due as everyone was focused on CPAC and a news report that Big Guy threatened to shoot down Israeli jets on a mission to take out Iranian nukes. (No comment from the Harf at State regarding that one, yet butt it’s bound to be good.)
Anyway, I’m speaking of course about the unveiling of Eric Holder’s official portrait at the Department of Justice last Friday:
The unveiling of the portrait (which, imho, has a wee bit too much ochre) along with the Attorney General’s imminent departure was simply overwhelming for both men. They were both moved to tears.
Common guys, hold it together. You can still have play dates after Ricky moves.
“You know, having good men in positions of power and authority, willing to fight for what’s right, that’s a rare thing, said Obama. [ed. No kidding.]
“That’s a powerful thing. It’s something that shapes future in ways we don’t even understand. We don’t always imagine,” he concluded, wiping away a tear. [ed. Oh, some of us understand, and don’t even need to use our imagination.] Video here
So let’s have a little recap of people who have touched BO emotionally during his presidency:
People whose lives/deaths have moved Big Guy to tears:
Eric Holden
Trayvon Martin
Michael Brown
Teddy Kennedy
Nelson Mandela, and, of course,
Himself!
Moved to tears while addressing his staff after the Won won again in 2012
And then there are those people whose lives/deaths did NOT bring Obama to tears:
Border Agent Brian Terry
Ambassador Chris Stevens
Tyrone Wood
Sean Smith
Glen Doherty
Margaret Thatcher
American Sniper Chris Kyle
Andrew Breitbart
James Foley
Steven Sotloff
Peter Kassig
I may be wrong, butt the only image on my hard drive of former President George W Bush crying was at the presentation of the Medal of Honor to the mother of deceased Marine, Jason Dunham.
Jason’s mother, Deborah Dunham, and President Bush share a tear.
Butt things have loosened up a bit around here since our first historic black president took office.
This is tomorrows post, today. Why? Because now it’s time to panic; we can’t wait for Rush to let us know. So troops, get your Breitbart on NOW!
Our government is plotting against us, its own citizens. They are doing so covertly, stealthily,and fraudulently.
We begin with a summary from The Independent Sentinel, which is based on Mark Levin’s interview (below) with Susan Payne, from WCBM radio, Baltimore. She was invited – inadvertently, I surmise - to listen in on conference calls conducted by representatives of the White House, Cabinet members and various immigrant groups to gather information for a report due to the President by this month:
Cecilia Munoz, director of the White House Domestic Policy Council, and 16 members of the White House cabinet were on the first call. White House officials were on all three calls. What Ms. Payne learned needs to be immediately shared with Congress and the public.
The White House has plans to legalize 13 to 15 million illegal immigrants who will then establish a “country within a country.”
The “Task Force of New Americans” and the “Receiving Communities” are part of a plan by the Obama administration to develop a “country within a country” which will eventually form a new, and instantly, fundamentally transformed United States.
The conference calls and meetings surrounding the task force made it clear Barack Obama is planning to legalize and protect 13 to 15 million illegal immigrants who will then be moved onto citizenship.
When these “new Americans” come out of the shadows, the communities in which they’ve been placed will be designated as “receiving communities.”
The “new Americans” are considered “seedlings” by the White House and the “receiving communities” are the “fertile ground” to nurture them, according to comments made during the meetings.
Citizens will then be pushed into the shadows as the “New Americans” come out of the shadows.
One member of the task force said they will be forming a “country within a country”.
At the meetings, it was said that “immigrants need to be aware of benefits they are entitled to”.
The participants in the meeting also discussed the fact that these immigrants would not be interested in assimilating. They would “navigate not assimilate”.
Obama’s plan is to treat the “new Americans” as refugees as soon as amnesty is pushed through.
Refugees are given an allowance, housing, food, medical care, education, and an immediate pathway to citizenship.
The meeting participants also discussed the need to convince state and local officials to give no interest loans to the “refugees.” This way we can fund our own destruction.
Listen to this shocking and frightening interview:
You have to Breitbart this one, people. Andrew would want that. Disseminate the information on this insidious plot to every blog, website, email address, social media network and book club that you can. The citizens deserve to know what our government is planning to do with our money, with our country. Open borders is One World Government claptrap, conveniently adopted by the Obama Administration and La Rasa to advance their agenda. They must be stopped.
“America has finally awoken to your Saul Alinsky bull**** tactics, and we’re coming to get you.”
Andrew Brietbart, 2012 CPAC
Three years after his death, and we’re still missing Breitbart. Why? Many reasons: because he was so good at exposing lies, half-truths and obfuscation, because nobody has stepped in to fill the void. Butt mostly because he was such a symbol of what we inherently know we need to beat back our generation’s evil empires, both foreign and domestic: a fighter, a no-holds-barred, take no prisoners sort of warrior.
Because he was everything we don’t see in the vast majority of those-who-would-be-leaders: focused, confrontational, combative…and right. Breitbart burned with righteous indignation, challenging authority not by sloganeering like the “Occupy freaks” - as he called them - butt by getting right in their faces.
He challenged people who were not used to being required to explain their pre-conceived notions and heartfelt beliefs.
He was not particularly eloquent. Nor was he terribly charming. He was simply effective; that’s why he was hated.
…You can judge a man by his enemies.
He challenged the left, on their terms, on their turf; and he won.
His enemies belittled him, calling him an idiot and a simpleton; yet he could singlehandedly disperse an angry Astroturf crowd by asking simple questions. Questions they simply couldn’t answer, like “Why are you here?” “Why is he a coward?” “Why do you call me ‘gay’?” Turning Saul Alinsky’s tactics on them he exposed not only their inability to live up to their words, butt their inability to even explain what they meant.
And yet…he always knew what the endgame was. And he knew what was required to win it
You want a unity speech? I’ll give you a unity speech. I don’t care who our candidate is. And I haven’t since the beginning of this. I haven’t! Ask not what the candidate can do for you, ask what you can do for the candidate! That’s what the Tea Party is. We are there to confront them on behalf of our candidate. I will march behind whoever our candidate is, because if we don’t, we lose. – Breitbart, CPAC 2012
Butt his support came with the tacit understanding that if we support you and you choose to ignore us afterwards, well, you too will be Breitbarted. Because to the army of warriors, truth still matters.
So just keep that in mind, GOP: we EXPECT you to make enemies, not nice.
The American Cemetery, Normandy, France
![bo pen_thumb[8]](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgwtnpj_EMv86mwMyh6GR16fc8Tj5M_BVct1MwetOXObvM0NxhkPknHvYIkKlXWa11fpOKMS64ogMyKY3gnPvuUvHs8JK2Ajjzas_1MD4lom3Zo4ThLeR8Cin5Ob07P-cjidrXeLy3Cwphv/s1600-h/bo%252520pen_thumb%25255B8%25255D%25255B4%25255D.jpg "bo pen_thumb[8]")
Posts
